首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >Adequacy Of The 1995 Antitrust Guidelines For IP Licensing Commentaries From The 2002 FTC and DOJ Hearings
【24h】

Adequacy Of The 1995 Antitrust Guidelines For IP Licensing Commentaries From The 2002 FTC and DOJ Hearings

机译:1995年反垄断指南对2002年FTC和DOJ听证会的IP许可评论的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1995, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) adopted new guidelines for the licensing of intellectual property rights without violating antitrust laws. The 1995 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property (IP Guidelines) state the antitrust enforcement policy of the DOJ and the FTC.1 The IP Guidelines drafted by the DOJ and FTC (the agencies) does not provide practitioners with a sufficient level of comfort as they attempt to predict the enforcement initiatives relative to intellectual property licensing.2 The IP Guidelines are inadequate because they misunderstand the nature of intellectual property markets and provide insufficient guidance in the most difficult areas. The IP Guidelines include a special treatment of a newly defined "innovation market" that is flawed and lack a focus on license-misuse activity that creates entry barriers. Antitrust and patent law practitioners have heavily debated the IP Guidelines. To address these concerns, in November 2001, the agencies held hearings on "Competition and Intellectual Property Law and Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy," which were held between February and November 2002. The hearings took place over 24 days at the University of California's Haas School of Business and in Washington, DC, and involved more than 300 panelists of representatives of high-tech industries and law firms, the independent inventor community, leading patent and antitrust organizations, and scholars in economics and patent and antitrust law.
机译:1995年,司法部(DOJ)和联邦贸易委员会(FTC)通过了新的知识产权许可准则,而又未违反反托拉斯法。 1995年的《知识产权许可反托拉斯准则》(IP准则)规定了DOJ和FTC的反托拉斯执行政策。1DOJ和FTC(代理机构)起草的IP准则并未为从业人员提供足够的安慰2知识产权准则不足,因为它们误解了知识产权市场的性质,并在最困难的领域提供了不足的指导。知识产权准则包括对新近定义的“创新市场”的特殊对待,该市场存在缺陷并且缺乏对造成进入壁垒的许可滥用活动的关注。反托拉斯和专利法从业者对《知识产权准则》进行了激烈的辩论。为了解决这些问题,2001年11月,这些机构举行了有关“知识经济中的竞争与知识产权法律和政策”的听证会。听证会在密西根大学举行,为期24天。加利福尼亚州的哈斯商学院(Haas School of Business)位于华盛顿特区,超过300名高科技行业和律师事务所,独立发明家社区,领先的专利和反托拉斯组织的代表以及经济学以及专利和反托拉斯法的学者参加了小组讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号