• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >Best and Worst Practices in Electronic Discovery
【24h】

Best and Worst Practices in Electronic Discovery

机译：电子发现的最佳和最差实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Attorneys today are faced with a vastly different discovery landscape than their predecessors. Paper storage of documents is no longer the model practice. Instead, companies and individuals alike are increasingly turning to electronic storage of information. It is estimated that 93 percent of documents are created electronically. There also are additional estimates that only 30 percent of documents are in hard copy format. For attorneys engaged in discovery, this means that the critical mass of documents and information to be obtained from opposing parties is found in cyberspace and on electronic storage devices. It is no wonder, then, that "lawyers who forsake electronic discovery on behalf of a client due to the costs come 'close to professional negligence.'"
机译：今天的律师面临着与其前任大相径庭的发现环境。文件的纸质存储不再是惯例。相反，公司和个人都越来越转向电子存储信息。估计有93％的文档是电子创建的。另外还有估计，只有30％的文档为硬拷贝格式。对于从事发现的律师来说，这意味着要在网络空间和电子存储设备中找到要从对方获取的关键数量的文件和信息。因此，难怪“由于成本而代表客户放弃电子发现的律师接近'专业疏忽'。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号