• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >PATENTS GIVE THE DMCA NEEDED TEETH: SALVAGING COPY PROTECTION IN THE POST - GROKSTER ERA
【24h】

PATENTS GIVE THE DMCA NEEDED TEETH: SALVAGING COPY PROTECTION IN THE POST - GROKSTER ERA

机译：专利提供了DMCA所需的牙齿：在后希腊时代保护复制保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was enacted to help stem the tide of damage caused by computerized copying, including the provision of protection against circumvention of technological measures used by copyright owners to protect their works. For all its promise, however, the DMCA is significantly limited in its ability to protect copyright owners' rights, particularly in the post-Grokster era. The public's right to fair use of copyrighted works, with the attendant constitutional implications, casts a long shadow over the ability of the DMCA to prevent copying effectively. To protect the public's right to fair use, there are substantial exceptions to the DMCA's proscription of circumvention of technological measures to prevent copying, which is why the DMCA has not been very effective as it wends an uncertain course through the federal courts. Enter patent law, in which there is no right to fair use. A patent owner has the right to prevent anyone from using the patented technology without permission. Whereas the copyright laws permit the making of a backup copy of a copyrighted work as a fair use, any copying of a patented product or service constitutes infringement of the patent absent permission from the patent owner. Coupled with the DMCA provisions regarding technological measures to prevent unauthorized copying, patent protection for copy protection technologies provides a new and superior way to prevent or at least reduce illegal piracy. In this way, it is unnecessary to rely on technology for copy protection, which can be and almost always is defeated/circumvented in one way or another. This new legal strategy has been used effectively in Macrovision v. 321 Studios, which will be discussed in this article.
机译：颁布了《数字千年版权法案》（DMCA），以帮助遏制计算机复制造成的损害浪潮，包括提供保护，以防止绕过版权所有者用来保护其作品的技术措施。然而，尽管有其所有的承诺，但数字千年版权法案（DMCA）在保护版权所有者权利方面的能力受到很大限制，尤其是在后格罗斯特时代。公众享有受版权保护的作品的合理使用权以及随之而来的宪法影响，严重影响了DMCA防止有效复制的能力。为了保护公众的合理使用权，数字千年版权法案（DMCA）禁止规避技术措施以防止复制的规定也有很多例外，这就是为什么数字千年版权法案（DMCA）效率不高的原因，因为它困扰着联邦法院的不确定过程。输入专利法，其中没有合理使用权。专利权人有权阻止任何人未经许可使用专利技术。版权法允许合理地制作受版权保护的作品的备份副本，但未经专利拥有者许可，对专利产品或服务的任何复制均构成对专利的侵犯。结合有关防止未经授权复制的技术措施的数字千年版权法案（DMCA）规定，针对复制保护技术的专利保护提供了一种新的，更好的方法，可以防止或至少减少非法盗版。这样，就不必依靠技术来进行复制保护，因为复制技术可以而且几乎总是以一种或另一种方式被破坏/规避。 Macrovision v。321 Studios已有效使用了这种新的法律策略，本文将对此进行讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号