...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Legal Studies >Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making
【24h】

Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making

机译：引用立法历史：关于积极的政治和情境司法决策理论的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We present empirical evidence suggesting that political context-judicial hierarchy and judicial panel dynamics-influences an authoring judge's use of legislative history. Specifically, we find that to the extent that political ideology matters, a district court judge's choice of legislative history is influenced, albeit modestly, by (1) the political makeup of the overseeing circuit court and (2) the political characteristics of a judge's panel colleagues, as well as by the circuit court as a whole. These factors matter more than the authoring judge's own political-ideological connection to the legislators. Put differently, an authoring judge will have a greater tendency to cite legislative history by legislators who share political party affiliation with the colleagues and superiors of the authoring judge than legislators sharing the same political party affiliation as the authoring judge himself. These findings are consistent generally with positive political and contextual theories of judicial persuasion, collegiaLity, and strategic decision making.
机译：我们提供的经验证据表明，政治背景（司法等级和司法小组动态）会影响创作法官对立法历史的使用。具体而言，我们发现，就政治意识形态而言，区域法院法官的立法历史选择在一定程度上受到以下因素的影响：（1）监督巡回法院的政治构成和（2）法官小组的政治特征同事，以及整个巡回法庭。这些因素比撰写法官自己与立法者的政治思想联系更为重要。换句话说，与与撰写法官本人享有相同政党归属的立法者相比，与撰写法官的同事和上级享有政党归属的立法者更倾向于引用立法历史。这些发现总体上与司法说服，合议和战略决策的积极政治理论和情境理论相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号