...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management & governance >Rethinking board diversity with the behavioural theory of corporate governance: opportunities and challenges for advances in theorising
【24h】

Rethinking board diversity with the behavioural theory of corporate governance: opportunities and challenges for advances in theorising

机译：用公司治理的行为理论重新思考董事会的多样性：理论发展的机遇与挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this study, a cross-theoretical hybridization between diversity archetypes and the behavioural theory of corporate governance is proposed. Within an integrative theoretical framework, I discuss three variants of the board’s social setting: diversity as variety; separation; and disparity. Their influence on the mechanisms of the socially-situated and socially-constituted agency, and in consequence the socially-constructed boardroom reality, is considered. The model stipulates what kind of impact individual agency perception, associated with each diversity archetype, can be expected to have on board task effectiveness (monitoring/control, resource-provision, and strategy-making/consulting). There are altogether six theoretical propositions made in this paper. The study represents an application of the behavioural theory of corporate governance in the theory-building paper. I utilise the notion of diversity and the theory of subgroups from existing group effectiveness literature. The proposed theoretical framework strongly benefits from recent taxonomically-systematizing efforts in the area of diversity research. The proposed model also allows for due consideration of behavioural patterns in the boardroom. This framework scores high on its generalisability to a wider population and realism of context, but low on its precision of measurement. A discussion of the model’s limitations unfolds in the wider context of the challenges and paradoxes/conundrums with which the community of corporate governance scholars is invariably confronted. The model suffers from a limited translatability of findings into actionable managerial implications and recommendations of the regulator, as expressed in corporate governance codes.
机译：在这项研究中，提出了多元化原型与公司治理行为理论之间的跨理论混合。在一个综合的理论框架内，我讨论了董事会社会环境的三种变体：多样性即多样性；分离和差距。考虑了它们对社会定位和社会组成的代理机构机制的影响，进而影响了社会构造的董事会现实。该模型规定了与每种多样性原型相关的各个机构的看法对董事会任务有效性（监视/控制，资源配置和战略制定/咨询）的影响。本文共提出了六个理论命题。该研究代表了公司治理行为理论在理论构建论文中的应用。我利用现有群体有效性文献中的多样性和子群理论。所提出的理论框架将极大地受益于多样性研究领域最近的分类学系统化工作。提议的模型还考虑了董事会中的行为模式。该框架在可推广到更广泛的人群和上下文的现实性方面得分很高，但是在度量精度上却很低。在公司治理学者社区始终面临的挑战和悖论/难题的大背景下，对该模型的局限性进行了讨论。正如公司治理法规所表达的那样，该模型的局限性在于，研究结果难以转化为可操作的管理含义和监管机构的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号