• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Academic Gerrymandering? Expansion and Expressions of Academic Work
【24h】

Academic Gerrymandering? Expansion and Expressions of Academic Work

机译：学术Gerrymandering？学术工作的扩展与表达

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As academic institutions creatively respond to exogenous forces requiring fundamental re-imagining of academic work, boundaries are being redrawn between traditional academic/professorial work and academic administration, resulting in blended job roles that constitute an incipient threat to academic values such as freedom and autonomy. After contrasting the nature of academic and nonacademic work, I draw on institutional theory to offer a model examining conditions under which blended academic and administrative roles engender four outcomes: positional dexterity, accommodating citizen, grab bag, and academic gerrymandering. I warn against institutional conditions that foster academic gerrymandering, or the redistricting of academic work for managerial benefit. I end the article with examples of other professions where administrative and core professional work have not been blended intentionally or well, and I suggest topics for future research.
机译：随着学术机构创造性地应对需要对学术工作进行基本重新构想的外来力量，传统的学术/专业工作与学术管理之间的界限正在重新划定，导致混合的工作角色对自由和自治等学术价值观构成了初期的威胁。在对比了学术和非学术工作的本质之后，我借鉴制度理论，提供了一个条件模型，在该条件下，学术和行政角色的融合产生了四个结果：位置灵巧，适应公民，抓包和学术管理。我警告不要鼓励学术风俗或为了管理利益而重新分配学术工作的制度条件。在本文结尾处，我列举了其他一些没有将行政和核心专业工作有意或很好地融合在一起的专业的例子，并提出了未来研究的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号