...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Getting Past the 'Government Sucks' Story: How Government Really Matters
【24h】

Getting Past the 'Government Sucks' Story: How Government Really Matters

机译：摆脱“政府糟透了”的故事：政府如何真正发挥作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

American business scholars have crippled their own work by ignoring the positive contributions of government spending and regulation. Because of the efforts made by corporate executives over the past generation to limit the power of government, business school academics have had little incentive to take a realistic view of the contributions governments make to business success. As a result, these scholars rarely acknowledge either the Keynesian or the Schumpeterian functions of government. This neglect has crippled scholarship, because these two functions have a significant effect on business strategies, organization, entrepreneurship, innovation, marketing, ethics, and business-government relations. Government's Keynesian function stimulates demand for goods and services through purchases and income redistribution. Government's Schumpeterian function lowers the cost of innovation through regulatory requirements, R&D subsidies, and the procurement of expensive new technology. Additional research is required to determine whether business scholars of other nations employ a more nuanced understanding of government's effect on business.
机译：美国商业学者忽视了政府支出和监管的积极贡献，使自己的工作陷入瘫痪。由于上一代企业高管为限制政府权力所做的努力，商学院学者几乎没有动力去现实地看政府对商业成功所做的贡献。结果，这些学者很少承认凯恩斯主义或熊彼特主义的政府职能。这种疏忽削弱了学术能力，因为这两个功能对商业策略，组织，企业家精神，创新，营销，道德和商业与政府关系都有重大影响。政府的凯恩斯主义职能通过购买和收入再分配刺激了对商品和服务的需求。政府的熊彼特职能通过监管要求，研发补贴和昂贵的新技术的采购降低了创新成本。需要其他研究来确定其他国家的商业学者是否对政府对商业的影响采用更细微的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号