...
【24h】

Editor's Introduction

机译:编辑介绍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For years, business faculty have voiced concerns about the implications of mission-based accreditation through the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). In the "good old days" before mission-based accreditation, a school would be accredited by the AACSB if its faculty were academically qualified (i.e., had proper degrees and were publishing) and if its administrators could document adequate levels of support for programs. As noted by McKenna, Cotton, and Van Auken (1997), programmes were evaluated in such areas as faculty preparation, publication and research performance, student admission standards, curriculum and resource availability. Only when a programme under review was found to meet the AACSB standards was it awarded accreditation. (p. 491)
机译:多年来,商学院一直对协会通过高级商学院(AACSB)进行基于任务的认证的含义表示担忧。在基于任务的认证之前的“美好时光”中,如果学校的教师具有学术资格(即具有适当的学位并正在出版),并且其管理人员能够证明对计划的支持水平足够,则该学校将获得AACSB的认证。正如McKenna,Cotton和Van Auken(1997)所指出的那样,对课程进行了评估,例如教师准备,出版和研究表现,学生入学标准,课程和资源可用性。仅当所审查的程序被发现符合AACSB标准时,它才被授予认证。 (第491页)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号