...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management studies >To Frack or Not to Frack? The Interaction of Justification and Power in a Sustainability Controversy
【24h】

To Frack or Not to Frack? The Interaction of Justification and Power in a Sustainability Controversy

机译：去弗拉克还是不去弗拉克？可持续性争论中正当性与权力的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

How could a de facto moratorium on shale gas exploration emerge in Quebec despite the broad adoption of fracking in North American jurisdictions, support from the provincial government and a favourable power position initially enjoyed by the oil and gas industry? This paper analyses this turn of events by studying how stakeholders from government, civil society, and industry mobilized modes of justification and forms of power with the aim to influence the moral legitimacy of the fracking technology during a controversy surrounding shale gas exploration. Combining Boltanski and Thevenot's economies of worth theory with Lukes' concept of power, we analytically induced the justification of power mechanisms whereby uses of power become justified or 'escape' justification, and the power of justification mechanisms by which justifications alter subsequent power dynamics. We finally explain how these mechanisms contribute to explaining the controversy's ultimate outcome, and advance current debates on political corporate social responsibility.
机译：尽管北美地区广泛采用压裂法，省政府的支持以及油气行业最初享有的有利电力地位，但魁北克实际上如何暂停页岩气勘探？本文通过研究来自政府，民间社会和行业的利益相关者如何调动理由和权力形式来分析这一轮事件，以期在围绕页岩气勘探的争议中影响压裂技术的道德合法性。将博尔坦斯基和塞弗诺的价值经济理论与卢克斯的权力概念相结合，我们分析性地得出了权力机制的正当性，从而使权力的使用成为正当的或“逃避”的正当性，以及通过正当性的正当性机制的力量改变了随后的动力动力。我们最后将解释这些机制如何有助于解释争议的最终结果，并推动当前有关政治企业社会责任的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号