• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of managerial psychology >Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures
【24h】

Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures

机译：工作狂措施的心理评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - Although the concept of workaholism has existed in the academic literature for decades, exploration of its measurements seems to lag behind. The purpose of this study is to present an investigation of the three most commonly used workaholism measures; the Workaholism Battery (WorkBAT), the Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) and the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS) in terms of their cross-validation, their temporal stability and their factor structure. Design/methodology/approach - The three measures were administered to 661 cross-occupational Norwegian workers. A total of 368 of these completed the same measures 24-30 months later. Findings - The cross-validation showed that the correlations between the scores of the different instruments were too low to conclude that they measure the same construct. The 24-30 month test-retest reliability coefficients for the measures revealed that the scores were quite stable over time. None of the previously suggested factor solutions for the three measures had a good fit with the data. Explorative factor analyses supported a four-factor solution for the WorkBAT and for the WART. A two-factor solution for the DUWAS was found. Research limitations/implications - All the data are based on self-report, which might bias the results. Practical implications - Different workaholism measures cannot be used interchangeably. Originality/value - This is the first study that cross-validates the three most used workaholism measures and which investigates the reliability of these instruments over a long-term period (24-30 months).
机译：目的-尽管工作狂的概念在学术文献中已经存在了数十年，但对其度量的探索似乎落后了。这项研究的目的是对三种最常用的工作狂措施进行调查。交叉验证，时间稳定性和因素结构方面的知识，包括工作狂电池（WorkBAT），工作成瘾风险测试（WART）和荷兰工作成瘾量表（DUWAS）。设计/方法/方法-对661名跨职业的挪威工人实施了这三种措施。其中总共368个在24-30个月后完成了相同的措施。研究结果-交叉验证表明，不同乐器的得分之间的相关性太低，无法得出结论，他们测量的是同一结构。这些措施的24-30个月重测信度系数显示，随着时间的推移，评分相当稳定。先前建议的三项措施的因子解均未与数据很好地吻合。探索性因素分析支持WorkBAT和WART的四因素解决方案。发现了DUWAS的两因素解决方案。研究局限性/含义-所有数据均基于自我报告，这可能会使结果产生偏差。实际意义-不同的工作狂措施不能互换使用。原创性/价值-这是第一个对三种最常用的工作狂措施进行交叉验证的研究，并且调查了这些工具在长期（24-30个月）内的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号