...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of marine science and technology >A COMPARISON OF FLOAT OWNERSHIP ISSUES FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS BETWEEN TAIWAN AND CHINA
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF FLOAT OWNERSHIP ISSUES FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS BETWEEN TAIWAN AND CHINA

机译：台湾与中国大陆建设项目的浮动所有权问题比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Float ownership is a controversial issue in construction projects. This study, which focuses on Taiwan and China, finds that attitudes regarding float ownership differ among stakeholders with different national and occupational backgrounds. To avoid disputes, practitioners should notice these differences before signing contracts. This study uses surveys to identify the potential differences in attitude regarding three important float ownership issues. The results vary from a previous study undertaken in the United Kingdom. The major findings of the study include: (1) contracts need to include clauses related to float ownership; (2) Taiwanese contractors and Chinese owners tend to view the float as their own; (3) the concept that the party delaying the critical path should take full responsibility may not be practical in resolving inconsistent opinions between the contractor and the owner; (4) the idea of granting contractor time or compensation when owner uses up float is acceptable; and (5) viewpoints of Taiwanese and Chinese neutral parties have no significant differences.
机译：浮动所有权在建筑项目中是一个有争议的问题。这项针对台湾和中国大陆的研究发现，在具有不同国家和职业背景的利益相关者之间，对持股量所有权的态度也有所不同。为避免纠纷，从业人员在签订合同之前应注意这些差异。这项研究使用调查来确定在三个重要的持股人所有权问题上态度上的潜在差异。结果与之前在英国进行的研究不同。该研究的主要发现包括：（1）合同需要包括与流通量所有权有关的条款； （2）台湾承包商和中方业主倾向于将浮标视为自己的； （3）延迟关键路径的一方应承担全部责任的概念对于解决承包商与业主之间的不一致意见可能不切实际； （4）在业主用完浮标时给予承包商时间或补偿的想法是可以接受的； （5）台湾和中国中立政党的观点没有明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号