• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >IS STUXNET PHYSICAL? DOES IT MATTER?
【24h】

IS STUXNET PHYSICAL? DOES IT MATTER?

机译：STUXNET是物理的吗？有关系吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Cyber-weapons are software and software, at least intuitively, is non-physical. Several authors have noted that this potentially renders problematic the application of normative frameworks like UN Charter Article 2(4) to cyber-weapons. If Article 2(4) only proscribes the use of physical force, and if cyber-weapons are non-physical, then cyber-weapons fall outside the purview of Article 2(4). This article explores the physicality of software, examining Stuxnet in particular. First, I show that with a few relatively uncontroversial metaphysical claims we can secure the conclusion that Stuxnet is physical. In particular, there exist instances of Stuxnet that are both located in space and causally efficacious, and this is very strong evidence for their being physical. Second, I argue that the question of physicality is actually irrelevant for the moral evaluation of an attack like Stuxnet because of its undeniably physical effects. Finally, I argue that some features of Stuxnet should make us optimistic about the prospects for discrimination and proportionality in cyberwarfare.
机译：网络武器是软件，至少从直观上讲，软件是非物理的。几位作者指出，这可能使将《联合国宪章》第二条第（4）款之类的规范性框架应用于网络武器可能会带来问题。如果第2条第（4）款仅禁止使用武力，并且如果网络武器不是物理武器，则网络武器将不在第2条第（4）款的范围之内。本文探讨了软件的物理特性，特别是研究了Stuxnet。首先，我证明了通过一些相对无争议的形而上学主张，我们可以得出结论认为Stuxnet是物理的。特别是，存在Stuxnet实例，它们既位于太空中又因果有效，这是它们具有物理性的有力证据。其次，我认为，物理性问题对于像Stuxnet这样的攻击的道德评估实际上是无关紧要的，因为它具有不可否认的物理效应。最后，我认为Stuxnet的某些功能应该使我们对网络战中歧视和相称性的前景感到乐观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号