• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >THE MORAL PERMISSIBILITY OF AUTOMATED RESPONSES DURING CYBERWARFARE
【24h】

THE MORAL PERMISSIBILITY OF AUTOMATED RESPONSES DURING CYBERWARFARE

机译：网络战期间自动响应的道德允许性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Automated responses are an inevitable aspect of cyberwarfare, but there has not been a systematic treatment of the conditions in which they are morally permissible. We argue that there are three substantial barriers to the moral permissibility of an automated response: the attribution, chain reaction, and projection bias problems. Moreover, these three challenges together provide a set of operational tests that can be used to assess the moral permissibility of a particular automated response in a specific situation. Defensive automated responses will almost always pass all three challenges, while offensive automated responses typically face a substantial positive burden in order to overcome the chain reaction and projection bias challenges. Perhaps the most interesting cases arise in the middle ground between cyber-offense and cyber-defense, such as automated cyber-exploitation responses. In those situations, much depends on the finer details of the response, the context, and the adversary. Importantly, however, the operationalizations of the three challenges provide a clear guide for decision-makers to assess the moral permissibility of automated responses that could potentially be implemented.
机译：自动响应是网络战的必然方面，但尚未对其道德上允许的条件进行系统的处理。我们认为，自动响应在道德上的可允许性存在三个主要障碍：归因，连锁反应和投射偏见问题。此外，这三个挑战共同提供了一组操作测试，可用于评估在特定情况下特定自动响应的道德允许性。防御性自动响应几乎总是会克服所有三个挑战，而防御性自动响应通常要面对巨大的积极负担，以克服连锁反应和投射偏见的挑战。也许最有趣的情况出现在网络攻击与网络防御之间的中间地带，例如自动网络利用响应。在这些情况下，很大程度上取决于响应的详细信息，上下文和对手。但是，重要的是，这三个挑战的可操作性为决策者评估可能实施的自动响应的道德允许性提供了明确的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号