• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >SINCERITY, ACCURACY AND SELECTIVE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION
【24h】

SINCERITY, ACCURACY AND SELECTIVE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION

机译：诚实，准确和有选择性的反对

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Conscientious objectors to military service are either general objectors or selective objectors. The former object to all wars; the latter object to only some wars. There is widespread popular and political support in western liberal democracies for exemptions for general objectors, but currently there is little support for exemptions for selective objectors. Many who advocate exemptions for selective objectors attempt to build upon the strength of support that is enjoyed by exemptions for general objectors. They argue that selective objectors - like general objectors - sincerely believe that it would be deeply morally wrong for them to fight in the wars to which they object. I argue that a stronger moral case for exemptions for selective objectors relies upon a different claim: selective objections are often accurate. It is often immoral to fight in the wars to which selective objectors object. While some advocates of exemptions for selective objectors have identified accuracy as a reason for offering exemptions, they have usually not adequately distinguished sincerity from accuracy. However, keeping these two moral reasons for exemptions distinct clarifies and strengthens the moral case for exemptions for selective conscientious objectors.
机译：出于良心拒服兵役的是一般性反对者或选择性的反对者。前者反对一切战争。后者只反对一些战争。西方自由民主制国家普遍支持普遍反对者的豁免，但目前很少有人支持选择性反对者的豁免。许多主张对选择性反对者实行豁免的人试图在对一般反对者的豁免中获得支持的力量。他们争辩说，像一般反对者一样，选择性反对者真诚地认为，在他们反对的战争中进行战斗在道义上是错误的。我认为，针对选择性反对者豁免的更强的道德理由依赖于另一种主张：选择性反对通常是准确的。在选择反对者反对的战争中打架通常是不道德的。尽管一些针对选择性反对者的豁免倡导者已将准确性确定为提供豁免的原因，但他们通常没有充分区分诚意与准确性。但是，将这两个道德上的豁免理由区别开来，可以明确并加强选择性良心拒服兵役者豁免的道德理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号