• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >HARD MORAL CHOICES IN THE MILITARY
【24h】

HARD MORAL CHOICES IN THE MILITARY

机译：军方的艰难道德选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Integrating and building on the constitutional ethics paradigm proposed by Paul Roush and the neo-intuitionist moral decision-making scheme proposed by Robert Audi, I defend a novel decision-making procedure for hard moral choices in the military. The key to Roush's model of justifiable disobedience is a soldier's ability to recognize when an ostensibly legal order constitutes a 'fundamental violation of justice'. However, the nature and structure of this act of moral recognition requires more elucidation than Roush has provided. In order to avoid grounding moral recognition and decision-making on a narrowly partisan account of moral theory (e.g. deontology or consequentialism), I appeal to Audi's neo-intuitionist account of prima facie moral duties. I then repurpose and develop further a decision procedure that Audi proposed for the business context. When faced with an ethical dilemma in military service, a soldier should (1) classify his/her obligations; (2) identify the conflicts between his/her obligations; (3) assess the weightiness of his/ her obligations; (4) determine ethically viable options; and then (5) make a decision. I close the discussion with an examination of the practical problems one might face in adopting the proposal.
机译：结合保罗·罗什（Paul Roush）提出的宪法伦理范式和罗伯特·奥迪（Robert Audi）提出的新直觉主义道德决策计划，我捍卫了一种针对军队中艰难的道德选择的新颖决策程序。鲁什（Roush）的合理抗命模式的关键在于，士兵有能力识别表面上的法律秩序何时构成“对正义的根本违反”。但是，这种道德认可行为的性质和结构需要比鲁什提供的更多说明。为了避免在狭part的党派主义道德理论（例如道义论或结果论）基础上建立起道德认可和决策基础，我呼吁奥迪对新表面主义的表面道德义务进行解释。然后，我重新调整目标，并进一步制定奥迪针对业务环境提出的决策程序。当在服役中面临道德困境时，士兵应（1）将其义务分类； （2）确定其义务之间的冲突； （3）评估其义务的重要性； （4）确定在道德上可行的选择；然后（5）做出决定。在结束讨论时，我会探讨通过提案时可能遇到的实际问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号