• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of military ethics >UNINHABITED AERIAL VEHICLES AND THE ASYMMETRY OBJECTION: A RESPONSE TO STRAWSER1
【24h】

UNINHABITED AERIAL VEHICLES AND THE ASYMMETRY OBJECTION: A RESPONSE TO STRAWSER1

机译：无人驾驶航空车辆和不对称性障碍：对STRAWSER1的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The debate about the ethics of uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) is failing to keep pace with the rise of the technology. Therefore, all the key players, including ethicists, lawyers, and roboticists, are keen to offer their views on the use of these drone aircraft. Some are opposed to their use, citing a range of ethical, legal and operational issues, while others argue for their ethically mandated use. BJ. Strawser fits into this latter category. He develops a principle of 'unnecessary risk', from which he argues that we have an ethical obligation to employ UAVs if we can do so without incurring a loss of capability. Strawser defends his argument against a number of potential objections, most questionably, the argument that the use of distance weaponry such as drones, against another state without distance weaponry, crosses some moral threshold that makes the combat immoral. Utilising Jeff McMahan's work on the inequality of combatants, Strawser essentially argues that there are no grounds for a 'fair fight'. However, this paper will argue that it is not so easy to overturn the doctrine of the moral equality of combatants, nor dismiss the problem with asymmetry. It will demonstrate that if the asymmetry reaches a certain level, the justification for resorting to war may be removed and some sort of policing action may remain the only option.
机译：关于无人驾驶飞行器（UAV）的伦理学的争论未能跟上技术的发展。因此，包括伦理学家，律师和机器人专家在内的所有主要参与者都热衷于就这些无人机的使用提出意见。有些人反对其使用，并列举了一系列道德，法律和运营问题，而另一些人则主张其在道德上必须使用。 BJ。 Strawser属于后一类。他提出了“不必要的风险”原则，据此他认为，如果我们能够在不造成能力损失的前提下使用无人机，我们就有道德义务。斯特劳瑟为许多潜在的异议辩护，最可疑的是，关于无人机等远程武器与另一种没有远程武器的国家的对抗超过了道德标准，使战斗不道德。斯特劳斯利用杰夫·麦克马汉（Jeff McMahan）关于战斗人员不平等的工作，从根本上说，没有理由进行“公平战斗”。但是，本文将论证，要推翻战斗人员的道德平等学说既不容易，也不能轻易消除不对称问题。这将证明，如果不对称程度达到一定程度，诉诸战争的理由可能会被消除，某种警务行动可能仍然是唯一的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号