...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of mixed methods research >Different Ways to Disagree: A Study of Organizational Dissent to Explore Connections Between Mixed Methods Research and Engaged Scholarship
【24h】

Different Ways to Disagree: A Study of Organizational Dissent to Explore Connections Between Mixed Methods Research and Engaged Scholarship

机译:不同的意见分歧方式:组织异议研究,探讨混合方法研究与聘用奖学金之间的联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organizational communication processes are complex, but all too often, researchers oversimplify the study of these processes by relying on a single method. Particularly when scholars and practitioners partner together to solve organizational problems, meaningful results require methodological flexibility and diversity. As an exemplar of the fit between mixed methods research and engaged scholarship, the present project used surveys, observations, and interviews to study the process of dissent in two organizations. Results emphasized that each organization's mission was a key factor in how employees expressed disagreement and how others responded. Emergent research questions and sequential data collection revealed insights that would have been missed in single method studies and provided more complete insights for the nonacademic practitioners involved in the study.
机译:组织的沟通过程很复杂,但是研究人员常常依靠一种方法过分简化了对这些过程的研究。特别是当学者和实践者共同解决组织问题时,有意义的结果需要方法上的灵活性和多样性。作为混合方法研究与聘用奖学金之间契合度的示例,本项目使用调查,观察和访谈来研究两个组织中异议的过程。结果强调,每个组织的使命是员工表达异议以及其他人如何回应的关键因素。新兴的研究问题和顺序的数据收集揭示了单方法研究中可能遗漏的见解,并为参与该研究的非学术从业人员提供了更完整的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号