• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs >Nagorno-Karabakh: Competing Legal, Historic and Economic Claims in Political, Academic and Media Discourses
【24h】

Nagorno-Karabakh: Competing Legal, Historic and Economic Claims in Political, Academic and Media Discourses

机译：纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫（Nagorno-Karabakh）：在政治，学术和媒体方面争夺法律，历史和经济方面的主张

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh (NK) region of Azerbaijan, which in its modern form has continued for some 20 years, is a complicated case study of multi-vector and multi-layered claims, mostly from the Soviet times, ranging from history, economy and legal status, used to justify the war, occupation and ethnic cleansing. The article illustrates that some of the weaker claims were dropped altogether, whilst others were continually mixed with additional charges to make them “stick” and are being repeated even today. Despite solid legal, historic and moral grounds, Azerbaijan has been lagging in clarifying and explaining the fictitious charges of NK's supposed transfer to Azerbaijan's suzerainty in 1920s, the legal status of NK itself, its economic and financial conditions in Soviet times, and the impossibility to apply the 3 April 1990 Soviet Law on Secession to the NK case whether for the purposes of justifying its independence or attachment to Armenia. Despite all the challenges and blame shared by all sides, NK and adjacent currently occupied territories are recognized as part of Azerbaijan, with the latter retaining all rights, including military, to return it under its full sovereignty. Both sides are well-armed and ready to wage another war instead of backtracking. The goal of this article is to help clarify some of the main claims related to the conflict, so that the international community can play a more pro-active and constructive role in helping to peacefully resolve this conflict.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2012.694662
机译：亚美尼亚-阿塞拜疆在阿塞拜疆的纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫（NK）地区发生的冲突以其现代形式持续了大约20年，是对多媒介和多层索赔的复杂案例研究，主要来自苏联时期，包括历史，经济和法律地位，用于为战争，占领和种族清洗辩护。该文章说明，一些较弱的索赔要求被完全放弃，而另一些索赔要求则不断与其他费用混合使用，以使它们“坚持”，直到今天仍在重复。尽管有坚实的法律，历史和道德依据，阿塞拜疆一直在澄清和解释NK假想在1920年代移交给阿塞拜疆的主权的虚假指控，NK本身的法律地位，苏联时期的经济和金融状况以及无论是为了证明其独立性还是对亚美尼亚的依附关系，均应将1990年4月3日的《苏联分裂国家法》适用于NK案。尽管各方都面临着所有挑战和责任，但也承认北约和其他目前被占领的领土是阿塞拜疆的一部分，阿塞拜疆保留了包括军事在内的一切权利，以使其完全享有主权。双方装备精良，随时准备发动另一场战争，而不是撤退。本文的目的是帮助澄清与冲突有关的一些主要主张，以便国际社会可以在帮助和平解决此冲突方面发挥更加积极和建设性的作用。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“ Taylor＆Francis Online”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}；添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2012.694662

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号