• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Kentucky journal of equine, agriculture, and natural resources law >Does the 2014 Farm Bill's New ACEP Program Really Benefit America, or Does a Lack of Funding Stymie Any Good Works?
【24h】

Does the 2014 Farm Bill's New ACEP Program Really Benefit America, or Does a Lack of Funding Stymie Any Good Works?

机译：2014年《农业法案》的新ACEP计划是否真的使美国受益，或者缺乏资金支持也没有任何好处？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite being a well-intended continuation of a policy dating back to the Great Depression, ACEP will fail to meet its stated goals so long as it professes a strong interest in conservation easements and a weaker interest in environmental improvements while faced with a severe budget shortage. ACEP's problems, like so many other government-created programs, stem from money troubles. The 2014 Farm Bill is steeped in tradition, and has sought the same general objectives as its predecessors for over eighty years. The very tradition that dictates the Farm Bill's easement and environmental goals, however, shall prove to be ACEP's undoing during the tenure of the current Farm Bill unless the government chooses to intervene and allocate the remaining funds in ACEP's coffers to its agricultural easement program. When the money runs out, the NRCS must make the call as to what policies should stay funded and which should become inactive until the next round of funding.
机译：尽管ACEP是延续自大萧条以来的良好政策，但只要面临着严重的预算短缺，只要它对保护地役权表现出浓厚的兴趣并且对环境改善的兴趣较弱，ACEP就无法实现其既定目标。像许多其他政府创建的计划一样，ACEP的问题也源于资金问题。 2014年《农业法案》根深蒂固，八十年来一直追求与其前任相同的总体目标。但是，支配《农业法案》的地役权和环境目标的传统将被证明是ACEP在当前《农业法案》任期中的undo折，除非政府选择干预并将ACEP保险库中的剩余资金分配给其农业许可计划。当资金用完时，NRCS必须就应保留哪些政策以及哪些政策在下一轮筹资之前变为无效进行呼叫。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号