...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation >The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
【24h】

The Mental Disability Military Assessment Tool: A Reliable Tool for Determining Disability in Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

机译：精神残疾军事评估工具：确定创伤后应激障碍退伍军人残疾的可靠工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose An assessment tool was developed to assess disability in veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to a military mission. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability, intra-rater and inter-rater variation of the Mental Disability Military (MDM) assessment tool. Methods Twenty-four assessment interviews of veterans with an insurance physician were videotaped. Each videotaped interview was assessed by a group of five independent raters on limitations of the veterans using the MDM assessment tool. After 2 months the raters repeated this procedure. Next the intra-rater and inter-rater variation was assessed with an adjusted version of AG09 computing weighted percentage agreement. Results The results of this study showed that both the intra-rater variation and inter-rater variation on the ten subcategories of the MDM assessment tool were small, with an agreement of 84–100 % within raters and 93–100 % between raters. Conclusions The MDM assessment tool proves to be a reliable instrument to measure PTSD limitations in functioning in Dutch military veterans who apply for disability compensation. Further research is needed to assess the validity of this instrument.
机译：目的开发了一种评估工具来评估因军事任务而遭受创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）的退伍军人的残疾。这项研究的目的是确定精神残疾军事（MDM）评估工具的可靠性，评估者内部和评估者之间的差异。方法对二十四名退伍军人与一名保险医生的访谈进行录像。五个独立评估者组成的小组使用MDM评估工具对每次录像采访进行了评估，以评估退伍军人的局限性。 2个月后，评估者重复此过程。接下来，使用AG09的调整版本计算加权百分比协议评估评估者内部和评估者之间的差异。结果这项研究的结果表明，MDM评估工具的十个子类别的评估者内部差异和评估者内部差异均很小，评估者内部的比例为84-100％，评估者之间的比例为93-100％。结论事实证明，MDM评估工具是衡量PTSD限制功能的可靠工具，该功能适用​​于申请了残疾补偿的荷兰退伍军人。需要进一步研究以评估该仪器的有效性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation》 |2015年第3期|569-576|共8页
  • 作者

    Andrea S. Fokkens; Johan W. Groothoff; Jac J. L. van der Klink; Roel Popping; Roy E. Stewart; Lex van de Ven; Sandra Brouwer; Jolanda Tuinstra;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Applied Research in Care (FA12) University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(1);

    Department of Health Sciences Community and Occupational Medicine University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(2);

    Department of Health Sciences Community and Occupational Medicine University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(2);

    Department of Sociology University of Groningen">(3);

    Department of Health Sciences Community and Occupational Medicine University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(2);

    Department of Health Sciences Community and Occupational Medicine University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(2);

    Social Security Institute (UWV)">(4);

    Department of Health Sciences Community and Occupational Medicine University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(2);

    Department of Applied Research in Care (FA12) University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen">(1);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Veterans disability claims; Reliability; Insurance disability; Instruments; Post-traumatic stress disorder;

    机译：退伍军人伤残索赔;可靠性;保险残疾;仪器;创伤后应激障碍;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号