• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Occupational Science >The 2010 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science Occupational Therapy/Occupational Science/Occupational Justice: Moral Commitments and Global Assemblages
【24h】

The 2010 Ruth Zemke Lecture in Occupational Science Occupational Therapy/Occupational Science/Occupational Justice: Moral Commitments and Global Assemblages

机译：2010年Ruth Zemke在职业科学上的演讲职业治疗/职业科学/职业正义：道德承诺和全球组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Twenty years have passed since occupational science was founded. It is time to reassess the relationship of occupational science to its roots in occupational therapy and also to reopen a discussion of some foundational assumptions. In particular, we need to situate the profession, occupational therapy, and the discipline, occupational science, in relation to the phenomenon of globalization. The internationalization of the post-World War II era, followed by the neoliberalism of the 1980s, began an erosion of state sovereignty that has empowered new formations in the global marketplace. New spaces exist for political action by non-state players, especially those concerned with human rights. Globalization did not set the stage for the founding of occupational science, but we can no longer look at the discipline outside the context of globalization. Globalization set the context for the transnational advocacy networks now operating that link occupational therapy with occupational science in service of a shared moral philosophy of social hope.View full textDownload full textKeywordsOccupational science, Occupational therapy, Globalization, Human rights, Moral philosophy, Social hopeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
机译：自职业科学成立以来已经过去了20年。现在该重新评估职业科学与其在职业治疗中的渊源的关系，并重新开始一些基本假设的讨论。特别是，我们需要根据全球化现象来定位专业，职业治疗以及学科，职业科学。第二次世界大战后时代的国际化以及随后的1980年代的新自由主义开始侵蚀国家主权，这在全球市场上形成了新的格局。非国家参与者，特别是那些与人权有关的参与者为政治行动提供了新的空间。全球化并没有为职业科学的建立奠定基础，但是我们再也不能在全球化背景下看待这一学科。全球化为现在运作的跨国倡导网络奠定了背景，该网络将职业治疗与职业科学联系起来，以服务于社会希望的共同道德哲学。查看全文下载全文关键词addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2011.607792

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号