• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior >Using a pattern-oriented approach to study leaders: Implications for burnout and perceived role demand
【24h】

Using a pattern-oriented approach to study leaders: Implications for burnout and perceived role demand

机译：使用面向模式的方法研究领导者：对倦怠和角色需求的暗示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Using a pattern-oriented approach, we identified clusters of leaders who shared theoretically meaningful combinations of transformational, contingent reward, management by exception active, management by exception passive, and laissez-faire leadership styles. Drawing upon conservation of resources theory, we examined whether leaders who shared a similar pattern of leadership styles differed from leaders who belonged to other profile groups, with respect to felt burnout and perceived role demands. Hypotheses were tested using a time-lagged field study involving 183 leaders. Using latent profile analyses, we found four theoretically interpretable patterns. Leaders who belonged to the comprehensive cluster (elevated scores on the transformational, contingent reward, and the passive styles; 14.2%) experienced the highest levels of burnout and role demands, whereas those who were disengaged (low scores on all styles; 33.3%) reported the lowest levels. Leaders who exhibited a passive behavioral pattern (elevated scores on management by exception active, management by exception passive, and laissez-faire relative to the other styles; 27.3%) experienced more burnout and role demands than did leaders who exhibited an optimal pattern (elevated scores on transformational and contingent reward styles relative to the passive styles; 25.1%). The theoretical and practical implications of a pattern-oriented approach to leadership research were discussed. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译：通过使用面向模式的方法，我们确定了在理论上有意义的变革，偶然奖励，例外主动管理，例外被动管理和放任型领导风格等组合的领导者群体。基于资源节约理论，我们在感觉疲倦和感知角色要求方面，检查了具有相似领导风格模式的领导者是否与属于其他个人档案的领导者不同。使用涉及183位领导者的时滞实地研究测试了假设。使用潜在的轮廓分析，我们发现了四个理论上可以解释的模式。属于综合集群的领导者（变革型，或有奖赏和被动型的得分较高； 14.2％）的职业倦怠和角色要求最高，而那些脱离工作的领导者（所有风格的得分较低； 33.3％）报告最低水平。表现出被动行为模式的领导者（相对于其他风格，异常主动处理的积极性得分高，异常被动处理的积极性和自由放任的得分； 27.3％）比最佳模式的领导者经历的倦怠和角色要求更高（升高相对于被动风格而言，变革性和偶然性奖励风格得分较高； 25.1％）。讨论了面向模式的领导力研究方法的理论和实践意义。版权所有（c）2017 John Wiley＆Sons，Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号