首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior >Conceptual and empirical confounds in the organizational sciences: An explication and discussion
【24h】

Conceptual and empirical confounds in the organizational sciences: An explication and discussion

机译:组织科学中的概念和实证混淆:说明和讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Confounding occurs when the definitions and measurements of constructs overlap. It is considered a fundamental flaw in both conceptualizing and testing relationships between variables. Although this logical and methodological error is well known, we argue that a significant amount of the published research and models of organizational behavior is undermined by definitional (i.e., conceptual) and subsequent measurement confounds. Throughout this article, examples of confounding are described. The article ends with a discussion of preventive measures that can be taken to reduce both the conceptual and measurement errors that result from confounding.
机译:当构造的定义和度量重叠时,就会发生混淆。在概念化和测试变量之间的关系时,它被认为是一个基本缺陷。尽管这种逻辑上和方法上的错误是众所周知的,但我们认为定义性(即概念性)和随后的测量混淆会破坏大量已发表的研究和组织行为模型。在本文中,描述了混淆的示例。本文最后讨论了可以采取的预防措施,以减少由于混淆而导致的概念错误和测量错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号