• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational change management >Exploring culture as a paradox: complementary QUEUE analysis of cultural values and practices
【24h】

Exploring culture as a paradox: complementary QUEUE analysis of cultural values and practices

机译：探索文化悖论：对文化价值和实践的补充队列分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the proposition that culture in international management has been dominated by a "Western dualism to measuring culture" (Caprar et al., 2015, p. 1024), which has resulted in severe problems and persistent limitations. The suggestion is that cultural research can be more productively conceived as a paradox involving a duality between two contrasting yet co-determined spheres or domains. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides an outline of culture as a paradox and an outline of a research approach to address the dualities of culture. Findings A cultural duality is described, which involves a paradoxical "yin-yang" relationship between two contrasting yet mutually constituted aspects of the collective mind. One domain, which involves conscious cognitive elements has dominated research characterized by positivism and empirical cross-cultural explorations of phenomenological cultural values. The second, more recondite domain, involves unconscious and embodied cultural phenomena, which are more tacit and hidden in indirect expression through communicative interaction, exchanges of symbolic representations and embodied behaviour in context. Originality/value The suggestion is that these cultural shadows have been relatively neglected thus far in cross-cultural management research. This means that in order to better comprehend culture as paradox, an equalization of approaches sensitive to both sides of the duality is prescient. In pursuit of this idea, a complementary qualitative analysis directed at more nebulous cultural phenomena is proposed in order to provide a balanced analysis of culture as paradox.
机译：目的本文的目的是提出这样一个命题，即国际管理中的文化已被“衡量文化的西方二元论”所主导（Caprar等，2015，第1024页），这导致了严重的问题和持续的局限性。这表明文化研究可以更有效地被理解为一个悖论，它涉及两个相对而又共同确定的领域或领域之间的对偶。设计/方法论/方法本文提供了一个作为悖论的文化概述和一个解决文化二元性的研究方法的概述。结论描述了一种文化二元性，它涉及集体思想的两个相对而又相互构成的方面之间的自相矛盾的“阴阳”关系。一个涉及意识认知要素的领域主导了以实证主义和现象学文化价值的实证跨文化探索为特征的研究。第二个更隐蔽的领域涉及无意识和具体化的文化现象，这些现象通过交流互动，符号表示的交换和具体化的行为在上下文中的隐性和间接表达中更加隐性和隐蔽。独创性/价值建议是，迄今为止，这些文化阴影在跨文化管理研究中相对被忽略了。这意味着为了更好地将文化理解为悖论，必须先对对偶性双方都敏感的方法进行均衡。为了追求这一想法，提出了针对更模糊的文化现象的补充定性分析，以便对作为悖论的文化进行均衡的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号