• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >LEGOLAND Windsor Park Ltd v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council
【24h】

LEGOLAND Windsor Park Ltd v Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council

机译：乐高乐园温莎公园公司v温莎皇家自治市镇和梅登黑德议会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

55.I have found that the proposal would not constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt. I have also concluded that there would be no harm to openness, either from the proposed building itself or from vehicular activity on the highway network. As such, there would be no conflict with Policies GB1, GB2 and GB9 of the LP. 56. Indeed, there is no compelling evidence to support the Council's view that the development would generate additional traffic. However, I have considered the worst case scenario presented by the appellant and have concluded that, in the context of the existing highway situation and in particular the daily and seasonal variations in traffic flows, the proposal would not be materially harmful to the operation of the local highway network. I therefore find no conflict with Policy DG1 of the LP.
机译：55.我发现该提议不会构成绿化带中的不当发展。我还得出结论，无论是拟议的建筑物本身还是高速公路网络上的车辆活动，都不会对开放性造成损害。这样，就不会与LP的策略GB1，GB2和GB9发生冲突。 56.确实，没有令人信服的证据支持安理会的看法，即发展将产生更多的交通。但是，我考虑了上诉人提出的最坏情况，并得出结论认为，在当前的高速公路状况下，尤其是交通流量的每日和季节性变化，该提案不会对高速公路的运营造成实质性损害。当地公路网。因此，我发现与LP的DG1策略没有冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号