...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum, Armstrong and Laidlow) v Wycombe DC, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
【24h】

R. (on the application of Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum, Armstrong and Laidlow) v Wycombe DC, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

机译：R.（在Daws Hill邻里论坛的申请中，Armstrong和Laidlow案）v Wycombe DC，社区和地方政府国务卿，以及Taylor Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

57. Section 61G(5) of the 1990 Act (inserted by the 2011 Act) requires the local planning authority in determining an application for a neighbourhood area to consider whether the area proposed is appropriate. The discretion given to the authority is a broad one. The exercise of discretion turns on the specific factual and policy matrix that exists in the individual case at the time the determination is made. In my judgment the Council properly had regard to the specific circumstances that existed at the time when the decision was made to designate a Neighbourhood Area which excluded the RAF Daws Hill site and the Handy Cross Sports Centre site. None of the grounds of challenge to the decision taken by the Council in this case have been made out.
机译：57. 1990年文本（由2011年文本插入）的第61G（5）条要求地方规划部门在确定邻里区域的申请时考虑所提议的区域是否合适。授予当局的酌处权是广泛的。自由裁量权的使用会根据确定时存在于每个案例中的特定事实和政策矩阵。根据我的判断，安理会已适当考虑了在决定指定一个不包括英国皇家空军道斯希尔场址和汉迪克罗斯体育中心场址的邻域时的具体情况。没有人提出对安理会在此案中作出的决定提出质疑的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号