...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >Design Style and Aesthetics as Material Planning Considerations
【24h】

Design Style and Aesthetics as Material Planning Considerations

机译：设计风格和美学是材料规划的考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In its publication "Design at Appeal" (2006) the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) asserts that "Design is about how places look and feel". It compares the 1988 and 1992 versions of Planning Policy Statement (PPS) Note 1: 'General Principles' with the current version and concludes that, whereas design had once been seen as not all that relevant to planning decisions, it was now of great relevance, pointing out that at para.33, PPS1 now states that design is "indivisible from good planning". The fourth bullet point of para.5 of PPS1 then requires that we "ensure high quality development through good and inclusive design". Government policy on design is then further set out in paras 33-39 which will be referred to later in this article.
机译：建筑与室内环境委员会（CABE）在其出版物“上诉时的设计”（2006）中宣称“设计与场所的外观和感觉有关”。它将1988年和1992年的《计划政策声明》（PPS）注1：“一般原则”与当前版本进行了比较，得出的结论是，尽管曾经被视为与计划决策无关的所有设计，但现在它具有重大意义。 ，指出在第33段，PPS1现在指出设计“离不开良好的计划”。因此，PPS1第5段的第四个要点是要求我们“通过良好和包容的设计确保高质量的开发”。政府的外观设计政策将在第33至39段中进一步阐述，这将在本文的后面提到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号