...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Political Science Education >Comparing Student Outcomes in Blended and Face-to-Face Courses
【24h】

Comparing Student Outcomes in Blended and Face-to-Face Courses

机译:比较混合课程和面对面课程的学生成绩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article reports on a study of student outcomes in a pair of matched courses, one taught face-to-face and one taught in a blended format, in which students completed most of the work online but met several times face-to-face. Learning objectives, course content, and pedagogical approaches were identical but the mode of instruction was different. The data suggest academic performance was not influenced by the mode of instruction. Additionally, the data show few differences between the sections in terms of attitudinal outcomes, although students in the blended section reported a lower sense of community. However, one notable outcome was the tendency of students to drop out of the online activities after having a face-to-face session. Lessons for the design of blended courses are discussed.View full textDownload full textKeywordsblended learning, online learningRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2012.641413
机译:本文报告了通过一对配对课程对学生的学习成果进行的研究,其中一门是面对面授课的,另一门是以混合形式授课的,在该课程中,学生们完成了大部分的在线工作,但又面对面碰面了几次。学习目标,课程内容和教学方法相同,但教学方式不同。数据表明教学成绩不受教学方式的影响。此外,尽管混合部分的学生报告的社区意识较低,但数据显示各部分之间在态度结果方面几乎没有差异。但是,一个值得注意的结果是,学生面对面开会后倾向于退出在线活动。讨论了有关混合课程设计的课程。 ,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2012.641413

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号