• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of political power >Editorial:thoughts on resistance, alienation, exchange and universal aspects of humanity
【24h】

Editorial:thoughts on resistance, alienation, exchange and universal aspects of humanity

机译：社论：人性抵抗，异化，交流与普遍方面的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the special section on Rosa's concept of resonance, we focussed upon felicitous social relations. Alienation was theorized as the opposite of resonance. This section opens with an article by Kasbari and Vinthagen on resistance, where they explore how to measure the effectiveness of it. In some respects, resistance lies at the fault line between alienation and resonant social relations. Why do social subjects resist? In particular, why do they resist in the types of micro and semi-covert ways that interest Kasbari and Vinthagen? They resist because they are not content with social relations, which they judge not to be resonant with their desires. Further, rather than simply exercising agency by overt political acts (such as forming a political party) that would result in change, they engage in small everyday acts of resistance because they believe that they do not have the possibility of effecting direct political change. In some sense, this speaks to the core of alienation, as the alienated social subject reproduces social structures that they have no control over. It is the social structures (the social object) that determine the life chances and form of the social subject. In the language of classic Marxism, workers create capital, which dominates the conditions of possibility for the workers - they must be exploited, to create profit, as 'demanded' by capital. Extending this more widely, when a social group finds themselves dominated (colonized, serfs in a semi-feudal social system and so on) their everyday activities contribute to the reproduction of the social relations that dominate them, which they must reproduce, while the only possibility for agency leading to social change is through resistance.
机译：在罗莎共振概念的特别部分，我们专注于令人兴奋的社会关系。异化是与共振相反的理论化。本节随着Kasbari和Vinthagen的一篇文章与抵抗，他们探索如何衡量它的有效性。在某些方面，抵抗在于异化和共振社会关系之间的故障线。为什么社会科目抵抗？特别是，为什么他们抵制兴趣Kasbari和Vinthagen的微观和半覆盖方式的类型？他们抵制，因为它们并不满足于社会关系，他们判断不与他们的愿望共鸣。此外，不仅仅是通过公开的政治行为（如形成一个政党），而不是简单地行使机构，这将导致变革，他们从事小于日常的抵抗行为，因为他们认为他们没有有可能改变直接政治变革的可能性。在某种意义上，这对异化的核心说话，因为疏远的社会主题再现了他们没有控制的社会结构。这是确定社会主题的生命机会和形式的社会结构（社会对象）。在经典马克思主义的语言中，工人创造了资本，占据了工人的可能性条件 - 他们必须被剥削，以创造利润，作为资本的“要求”。当一个社会群体发现自己占主导地位（在半封建社会系统中的Serfs等）时，他们的日常活动更加广泛，他们的日常活动有助于统治他们必须繁殖的社会关系的复制，而唯一的导致社会变革的机构可能是通过抵制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of political power》 |2020年第3期|415-417|共3页
  • 作者

    Mark Haugaard;

  • 作者单位

    National University of Ireland Mountscribe Kinvara Co Galway H91 A9RV Ireland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号