• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of power >Foundations of organization power
【24h】

Foundations of organization power

机译：组织力量的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I shall argue that the foundations of organization power were laid down in practiec through theories of power - in the sense that they sought to explain power - but through quite pragmatic practices that were not necessarily regarded as embodying a theory of power, which I shall maintain they most assuredly did. Thus, in a second move, I shall argue that while these practices began with a focus on the body of the employee they moved on to consider their consciousness and soul. Third, 1 shall briefly consider the main themes in organization theories' treatment of power, organized around notions of system rationality and uncertainty. These have an implicit idealism attached to them, 1 shall suggest. Fourth, 1 shall switch focus to the broader canvass of social theory in the post-war era and suggest that this has also displayed a strongly idealist streak, focusing especially on the celebrated structuralist account of power as a matter of layered dimension that Steven Lukes (1974, 2005) produced. Fifth, I shall contrast the idealism of this approach with a more pragmatic conception of power, one that can be found in the perspectives with which I opened the paper, perspectives that derive from more Foucauldian-influenced currents of contemporary social theory. Drawing on these, I will suggest a different way of understanding Lukes' radical third dimension of power as a means of organizing and rationalizing innovations in power relations, drawing on the literature of the 'dominant ideology thesis' (Abercrombie et al. 1980) to do so. Finally, I shall suggest switching from the structuralist metaphors of dimensions to an imagery of flows as a more appropriate model for understanding power relations.
机译：我将争辩说，组织权力的基础是通过权力理论在实践中奠定的（就某种意义而言，它们试图解释权力）是通过相当实用的实践，这些实践不一定被视为体现了权力理论，我将坚持这一观点。他们最有把握地做到了。因此，在第二步中，我将争辩说，尽管这些实践始于关注员工的身体，但他们继续考虑自己的意识和灵魂。第三，应简要考虑围绕组织合理性和不确定性概念组织的组织理论中权力处理的主要主题。这些具有一种隐含的理想主义，应予以建议。第四，应将重点转移到战后时代的更广泛的社会理论画布上，并建议这也表现出强烈的理想主义倾向，尤其是着眼于史蒂文·卢克斯（Steven Lukes）（ 1974，2005）制作。第五，我将这种方法的理想主义与更为务实的权力观进行对比，这种权力观可以从我打开本文的观点中找到，这些观点源于更多受福柯主义影响的当代社会理论潮流。以此为基础，我将提出一种不同的理解卢克斯的权力的第三维度的方式，以此作为组织和合理化权力关系创新的手段，并借鉴“主要意识形态论点”的文献（Abercrombie et al。1980）。这样做。最后，我建议从维度的结构主义隐喻切换到流动的图像，作为更了解理解权力关系的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号