• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of power >EDITORIAL
【24h】

EDITORIAL

机译：社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years, the literatures on power and on space are undergoing a constructivist turn. As traditionally conceived space was an external reality in which social actions took place. Before globalization became fashionable in the social sciences, the territorial state was perceived of as a natural power container, clearly demarcated and situated in measured space. With the advent of globalization, it became obvious that the state constitutes a contingent transitory power container, whose dominance as a political form lasted from the treaty of Westphalia, in 1648, to the end of the twentieth century. In the work of Giddens (1985), Mann (1993) and Manuel Castells (1996), we witness a changed relationship between political power and space - territorial units became replaced by networks, which entailed the reorganization of space. However, while space became porous, yet it was still interpreted conceptually as given. Under the influence of Lefebvre's work, The Production of Space (1991 - date of the English translation), social theorists have realized that both the territorial state and space are contingently constructed. The state did not manage space, as a given external reality; rather the emergence of the state was coterminous with the advent of the creation of modern perceptions of space (Werlen 1993, 2004). Those acting upon the behalf of the state were among the many agents creating this new form of space. Within this process the state-sponsored exercise of mapping space constituted a social praxis that validated, and was a product of, a new type of habitus of the modern age.
机译：近年来，关于力量和空间的文献正在经历建构主义的转折。正如传统上所设想的那样，空间是发生社会行为的外部现实。在全球化在社会科学中流行之前，领土国家被认为是自然力量的容器，被清楚地划界并位于可测量的空间中。随着全球化的到来，显而易见的是，国家构成了一个临时的临时力量容器，其作为政治形式的主导地位一直持续到1648年的《威斯特伐利亚条约》，一直持续到20世纪末。在吉登斯（Giddens，1985），曼（Mann，1993）和曼努尔·卡斯特尔（Manuel Castells，1996）的著作中，我们看到了政治权力与空间之间的关系发生了变化-领土单位被网络所取代，这意味着空间的重组。但是，尽管空间变得多孔，但仍然在概念上按给定的方式进行解释。在列斐伏尔的作品《空间的产生》（1991年，英语翻译之日）的影响下，社会理论家认识到领土状态和空间都是偶然性的。在给定的外部现实中，国家没有管理空间。相反，国家的出现与现代空间观的出现相伴而生（Werlen 1993，2004）。那些代表国家行事的人是创造这种新形式的空间的众多主体之一。在此过程中，由国家赞助的对地图空间的使用构成了一种社会实践，证实了现代新型习惯的产生，并以此为产物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号