...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of product innovation management >Complements or Substitutes? Internal Technological Strength, Competitor Alliance Participation, and Innovation Development
【24h】

Complements or Substitutes? Internal Technological Strength, Competitor Alliance Participation, and Innovation Development

机译：补品或替代品？内部技术实力，竞争对手联盟的参与和创新发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While a firm can choose to develop an innovation internally or externally, the internal knowledge development and external knowledge acquisition tend to interact with each other in the innovation process. The present study examines whether internal technological strength and external competitor alliance participation serve as complements or substitutes in innovation development. Built on the knowledge-based view, this study offers a contingency perspective on the nature of knowledge integration between internal technological strength and external alliance relationships, and how they jointly influence radical and incremental innovation differently. Adopting a random effect negative binomial model specification, a panel data set of 64 pharmaceutical firms over a 15-year period were used to test the hypothesized effects. The findings indicate that internal technological knowledge strength has an inverted U-shaped relationship with radical and incremental innovation. More importantly, the findings also demonstrate that the combined effect of internal and external sources of innovation can have differential effects on radical and incremental innovation development. Specifically, competitor alliance participation strengthens the effect of internal technological strength on incremental product innovation while it weakens the above effect on radical product innovation. This suggests that internal and external sources of innovation may complement each other for incremental innovation while they may represent trade-offs for radical innovation development. The above findings provide empirical evidence for the complexity of pursuing organizational ambidexterity in innovation generation and highlight the importance of balancing the internal and external knowledge sources in pursuing innovation.
机译：虽然企业可以选择在内部或外部进行创新，但是内部知识的开发和外部知识的获取往往在创新过程中相互影响。本研究检验了内部技术实力和外部竞争者联盟的参与是否可以作为创新发展的补充或替代。基于知识的观点，本研究对内部技术实力与外部联盟关系之间的知识整合的本质以及它们如何共同以不同方式共同影响激进和渐进式创新提供了权变观点。采用随机效应负二项式模型规范，使用15年内64家制药公司的面板数据集来检验假设的效应。研究结果表明，内部技术知识强度与激进和渐进式创新具有倒U型关系。更重要的是，研究结果还表明，内部和外部创新来源的综合影响可以对激进和渐进式创新发展产生不同的影响。具体地说，竞争对手联盟的参与增强了内部技术实力对增量产品创新的影响，而削弱了上述对根本产品创新的影响。这表明，创新的内部和外部资源可以相互补充，以进行增量创新，同时也可以代表进行根本性创新发展的权衡。上述发现为在创新产生中追求组织灵活性的复杂性提供了经验证据，并突出了在追求创新时平衡内部和外部知识来源的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of product innovation management》 |2013年第4期|750-762|共13页
  • 作者

    Shichun Xu; Fang Wu; Erin Cavusgil;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Marketing and Logistics, University of Tennessee, 321 Stokely Management Center, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996;

    Marketing at University of Texas at Dallas;

    University of Michigan-Flint;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号