• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Progressive Human Services >'Parent Advocacy' as an Ideological Code: LGBTQ Parents Engage with Disability Services
【24h】

'Parent Advocacy' as an Ideological Code: LGBTQ Parents Engage with Disability Services

机译：“父母倡导”作为思想法代码：LGBTQ父母与残疾人服务进行聘用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

What does the work that LGBTQ parents do to find resources for their disabled children reveal about the social organization of services? This article presents findings from an institutional ethnography study based on interviews with 15 lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ) parents and six key community informants in Toronto, Canada. The analysis focused on the work parents did to engage with disability service systems on behalf of their children, and the ways in which families' social privilege and/or marginalization affected their experiences. Particular attention was paid to the ways in which "parent advocacy" was taken up, responded to, and critiqued in these interviews. "Parent advocacy" was found to operate as what Dorothy Smith has called an "ideological code" (Smith 1999), offloading systemic responsibilities onto parents, shielding inequities, and promoting individualized competition between service users. This study suggests that the systemic organization that makes "parent advocacy" necessary also renders parents' relative privilege or marginality central to what their children receive.
机译：LGBTQ父母为他们残疾儿童找到资源的工作揭示了关于社会的服务组织？本文介绍了一个基于15女同性恋，同性恋，双性恋，跨性别和/或奇怪（LGBTQ）父母和加拿大多伦多的六个关键社区信息人员的机构民族志学习的调查结果。专注于工作父母的分析确实代表他们的孩子互动服务系统，以及家庭社会特权和/或边缘化影响其经验的方式。特别注意在这些访谈中予以回应的“父母倡导”，并在这些访谈中批评并批评。 “父母倡导”被发现是Dorothy Smith所谓的“思想码”（Smith 1999），将系统责任卸载到父母，屏蔽不公平，并促进服务用户之间的个性化竞争。本研究表明，使“父母倡导”必要的系统组织也使父母的相对特权或边缘性核心赋予他们的孩子接受的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号