• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Progressive Human Services >Subjectivity as 'evidence': an exploration of medication adherence in the treatment of schizophrenia using in-depth interviews
【24h】

Subjectivity as 'evidence': an exploration of medication adherence in the treatment of schizophrenia using in-depth interviews

机译：主体性为“证据”：使用深入访谈探索精神分裂症治疗精神分裂症的探索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Anti-psychotic medication is considered one of the most effi-caciousinterventions for the treatment of severe schizophrenia, yet ratesof adherence are notoriously and consistently low despite volumesof medical research. Scientific knowledge has failed to improvemedication adherence because it systematically rejects subjectiveexperience in conceptualizing mental illness. In this paper, thecontent of interviews with people diagnosed with schizophreniareceiving Assertive Community Treatment are interpreted from aFoucaldian perspective to illuminate how disciplinary assumptionsperpetuate power inequities and may be a barrier to adequateresearch generation and effective treatments. Implications for futureresearch methodology and clinical approaches are discussed.
机译：抗精神病药物被认为是治疗严重精神分裂症的最富含浓度的诱饵之一，但依从性的速度令人难以置上且始终如一地低，尽管医学研究体积缺乏。科学知识未能改善依据，因为它系统地拒绝主观化精神疾病。在本文中，从Afoucaldian视角解释了被诊断患有精神分裂症的人的访谈的对话，以照亮普通的普通功率不公平，并且可能是适当的障碍和有效治疗的障碍。讨论了未来研究方法和临床方法的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号