...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >A defence of participation income
【24h】

A defence of participation income

机译:参保收入辩护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article offers a novel defence of participation income (PI). It claims that there are pragmatic and normative reasons to prefer PI over alternative redistributive policies, such as an unconditional basic income and workfare programmes. In particular, it argues that PI should be conceived as a particular type of civic service programme designed to address a large number of unmet social needs that are not met by entrepreneurs in the marketplace. The article ends by addressing five objections that can be raised against its argument.
机译:本文提供了一种新颖的参与收益辩护。它声称,出于实用和规范的原因,PI比替代的再分配政策(例如无条件的基本收入和工作计划)更偏爱PI。特别是,它认为PI应该被视为一种特定类型的公民服务计划,旨在解决市场上企业家无法满足的大量未满足的社会需求。本文最后提出了可以针对其论点提出的五个反对意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号