首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >Policing methamphetamine problems: a framework for synthesising expert opinion and evaluating alternative policy options
【24h】

Policing methamphetamine problems: a framework for synthesising expert opinion and evaluating alternative policy options

机译:警惕甲基苯丙胺问题:综合专家意见和评估替代政策选择的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Increasingly, governments and police agencies require evidence of effectiveness and efficiency with respect to law enforcement policies. The existing "what works" literature, specifically on drug law enforcement, focuses mainly on the effectiveness question when making complex choices between drug policy alternatives, but fails when it comes to incorporating empirical evidence and the experience of key experts in the decision-making process. In addition, little attempt has been made to employ sophisticated techniques to assist in complex policy decision making with respect to funding competing policing policy alternatives. We use the methamphetamine problem in Australia to illustrate a way of evaluating, using multi-criteria analysis, alternative policy options for developing better drug policy.
机译:越来越多的政府和警察机构要求就执法政策提供有效性和效率的证据。现有的“行之有效”的文献,特别是有关禁毒执法的文献,主要侧重于在毒品政策备选方案之间做出复杂选择时的有效性问题,但在将经验证据和关键专家的经验纳入决策过程时却失败了。 。此外,在资助竞争性警务政策选择方面,很少尝试采用复杂的技术来协助复杂的政策决策。我们使用澳大利亚的甲基苯丙胺问题来说明一种使用多标准分析评估替代性政策选择以开发更好的毒品政策的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号