【24h】

From the editors

机译:来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The four papers in this issue deal with the important issues of human trafficking, taxation, decision-making and the impact of European Union institutions. They all address questions of social science theory and have implications for some of the pressing issues that policy-makers face today. So they are good examples of the unique contribution that public policy scholarship can make. The first paper displays this balance very nicely. Nazli Avdan in "Human trafficking and migration control policy: vicious or virtuous cycle?" asks whether there are feedback effects from policies on human trafficking. Are modern states in a bind: whether they are lax or tough in their controls, do they end up encouraging human trafficking? The paper finds that particular policies, such as visa controls implemented at borders, have this unwanted effect. The findings show importance of feedback, but they also demonstrate to policy-makers the impact of the policies they adopt.
机译:本期的四篇论文涉及人口贩运,税收,决策和欧盟机构的影响等重要问题。它们都解决了社会科学理论的问题,并对当今决策者面临的一些紧迫问题产生了影响。因此,它们是公共政策奖学金可以做出独特贡献的很好的例子。第一篇论文很好地显示了这种平衡。纳兹利·阿夫丹(Nazli Avdan)在“人口贩运和移民控制政策:恶性循环还是良性循环?”中询问政策是否对人口贩运有反馈作用。现代国家是否处于束缚之中:无论是放松管制还是强硬控制,它们最终都会鼓励人口贩运吗?该文件发现,某些特殊政策(例如在边境实施签证控制)会产生这种不良影响。调查结果显示了反馈的重要性,但同时也向决策者展示了所采用政策的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号