• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >The Effectiveness of Self-Regulation by the Private Military and Security Industry
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Self-Regulation by the Private Military and Security Industry

机译：私营军事和安保行业的自我监管效力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Security is generally considered a core public good provided by the state. Since outsourcing military and security tasks erodes the state's monopoly of force, we would expect regulation in this area to be stronger than in areas that do not have potentially lethal consequences. But neither caution nor careful regulation is evident in state responses to the emergence of private military and security companies; instead, the industry's rapid growth has outpaced government efforts to control their activities. This article assesses whether two industry associations, the US-based International Peace Operations Association (IPOA) and the British Association of Private Security Companies (BAPSC), have adopted mechanisms necessary for effective self-regulation, and it evaluates different national approaches to self-regulation. Neither the IPOA nor the BAPSC has established self-regulatory mechanisms able to monitor or sanction member companies' behavior. The IPOA's activities correspond to American patterns of self-regulation, while the BAPSC's efforts suggest weaker linkages with the British government than seen in other self-regulatory mechanisms.
机译：安全通常被认为是国家提供的核心公共物品。由于将军事和安全任务外包会削弱国家对武力的垄断，因此我们希望在这方面的监管要强于没有潜在致命后果的地区。但是，在国家对私营军事和安全公司的出现的反应中，既没有谨慎也没有仔细的监管。相反，该行业的快速增长已经超过了政府控制其活动的努力。本文评估了两个行业协会，即总部位于美国的国际和平行动协会（IPOA）和英国私人安全公司协会（BAPSC），是否已采取有效自我监管所必需的机制，并评估了不同的国家自我监管方法。规。 IPOA和BAPSC均未建立能够监控或制裁成员公司行为的自我监管机制。 IPOA的活动与美国的自律模式相对应，而BAPSC的努力表明与英国政府的联系比其他自律机制弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号