...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >Politics or management? Analysing differences in local implementation performance of the EU Ambient Air Quality directive
【24h】

Politics or management? Analysing differences in local implementation performance of the EU Ambient Air Quality directive

机译:政治或管理层?欧盟环境空气质量指令的本地实施性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As far as local governments are responsible for the practical implementation of many European Union (EU) policies, they codetermine member states' EU compliance records and the fate of EU legislation. Yet, they do so in remarkably different ways, as exemplified by the variegated implementation of the Ambient Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC by Dutch municipalities. Taking guidance from the literature on EU compliance, in this article we explain the differences in local implementation performance based on the political and managerial approaches. Understanding which of the two approaches drives different local responses to EU policy bears consequences for the appropriate remedy for nonimplementation. Four municipalities were purposefully selected along with the two-by-two implementation performance scoring matrix in the realm of air quality. A comparative within-case analysis specifies how political explanations outweigh managerial explanations in accounting for variation in implementation performance and distils 'policy saliency' as the driving causal mechanism.
机译:据当地政府负责许多欧盟(欧盟)政策的实际执行,他们是Codermine成员国的“欧盟合规记录和欧盟立法的命运”。然而,他们以非常不同的方式这样做,例如由荷兰市各国的环境空气质量指令2008/50 / eC的差异实施。从文献中获取欧盟遵守的指导,在本文中,我们根据政治和管理方法解释了地方实施业绩的差异。了解两种方法中的哪一项驱动对欧盟政策的不同当地答复,对非划算的适当补救措施的影响。有目的地选择了四个市政当局在空气质量领域的二手实施性能评分矩阵。在案例分析的情况下,指定了政治解释如何突出管理解释,以考虑实施绩效的变化,并将其蒸馏的政策显着性“作为驱动因果机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号