...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Policy >Speaking truth to power: political advisers' and civil servants' responses to perceived harmful policy proposals
【24h】

Speaking truth to power: political advisers' and civil servants' responses to perceived harmful policy proposals

机译:对权力说出真相:政治顾问和公务员对感知有害政策提案的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How are civil servants and politically appointed advisers likely to respond to policy proposals that they believe will harm their countries severely even if they are legal? Based on the different loyalties and roles of political advisors (PA) and civil servants (CS), we hypothesise that (1) PAs are more likely to voice internally, (2) CSs are more likely to voice externally and (3) CSs in functionally politicised systems are more likely to stay silent. These hypotheses are tested on - and partially supported by - data collected through two surveys directed to the ministerial staffs in Denmark and Sweden. PAs are more likely to voice internally, but none of the two groups is particularly keen to voice externally. The propensity to voice concerns in case of perceived harmful policy proposals depends on the kind as well as the level of politicisation.
机译:公务员和政治指定的顾问如何应对他们认为将严重损害他们的国家的政策提案?基于政治顾问(PA)和公务员(CS)的不同忠诚和角色,我们假设(1)PAS更有可能在内部进行语音,(2)CSS更容易发生外部和(3)CSS功能政治化系统更有可能保持沉默。这些假设在通过两次调查中进行的数据进行了测试,并部分支持 - 通过针对丹麦和瑞典部长级人员的调查。 PAS更有可能在内部进行语音,但两组都没有特别热衷于外部语音。在感知有害政策提案的情况下,语音担忧的倾向取决于实物以及政治化水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号