• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Involving community members in preparedness and resiliency involves bi-directional and iterative communication and actions: a case study of vulnerable populations in New Jersey following superstorm Sandy
【24h】

Involving community members in preparedness and resiliency involves bi-directional and iterative communication and actions: a case study of vulnerable populations in New Jersey following superstorm Sandy

机译：让社区成员参与备灾和恢复力涉及双向和反复的沟通与行动：以桑迪飓风过后新泽西州弱势人群为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent increases in hurricanes and other weather events have brought to light the importance of understanding what people think should be done to improve recovery and resiliency in their communities. While most studies focus only on perceptions of concerns, effects, medical issues and personal preparedness, herein subjects in New Jersey were interviewed to determine future actions they intend to follow, the actions they think agencies or others should be taking, and present a conceptual model for involvement of vulnerable community members in their own protection for future catastrophic events. The emphasis was on government and community actions. It is a bottom-up approach rather than a top-down approach to reduction of future risk. The case study involved subjects interviewed immediately following Sandy (general affected public; N = 756) and 2-3 years after Sandy (vulnerable population, N = 586). Concerns of subjects within 100 days related to friends family, safety and survival, food and water and medical concerns as well as recovery, repairs on their property, and community safety. Two to three years later, subjects remembered being significantly more concerned about family, friends, safety and survival, food and water and medical concerns than subjects interviewed within 100days. Memories (or concern) also faded with respect to future preparedness; significantly more subjects interviewed 2-3 years after Sandy were going to do nothing, were less concerned about protecting family, community, and possessions than subjects interviewed within 100 days of Sandy. In contrast, the same percentage were going to evacuate and buy supplies, so it is not just a matter of forgetting the whole event. The data from open-ended questions indicated that subjects believed that recovery and preparation for a future severe storm event involved complicated and iterative activities of many different individuals, organizations, and governmental agencies. Thus we present an iterative, interactive model, and provide examples of how subjects viewed the interactions necessary to provide resiliency to their communities. We discuss the value-added of a bottoms-up approach to understanding risk reduction, preparedness and resiliency.
机译：最近飓风和其他天气事件的增加使人们认识到了解人们认为应该采取哪些措施来改善其社区的恢复和复原力的重要性。虽然大多数研究仅关注关注点，影响，医疗问题和个人准备的观念，但在此采访了新泽西州的受试者，以确定他们打算采取的未来行动，他们认为代理机构或其他人应该采取的行动，并提出概念模型让弱势社区成员参与他们自己对未来灾难性事件的保护。重点是政府和社区的行动。它是一种自下而上的方法，而不是自上而下的方法，以减少未来风险。该案例研究涉及在桑迪之后（一般受影响的公众; N = 756）和桑迪之后2-3年（弱势人群，N = 586）接受采访的对象。在100天之内，与受害人的家人，安全和生存，食物和水以及医疗问题以及康复，财产维修和社区安全有关的主题问题。两到三年后，与100天之内采访的对象相比，对象记住与家人，朋友，安全和生存，食物，水和医疗有关的问题要多得多。关于未来的准备，记忆（或忧虑）也消失了。与桑迪100天之内采访的对象相比，在桑迪无所事事的2-3年后采访的对象要多得多，他们对保护家庭，社区和财产的关注程度要低得多。相反，疏散和购买物资的比例相同，所以这不仅仅是忘记整个事件。来自开放式问题的数据表明，受试者相信，为未来的严重风暴事件进行恢复和准备涉及许多不同的个人，组织和政府机构的复杂且反复的活动。因此，我们提出了一个迭代的交互式模型，并提供了有关对象如何查看为社区提供恢复力所必需的交互的示例。我们讨论了自下而上的方法的增值，以了解降低风险，准备和弹性的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号