...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of scholarly publishing >An Expanded Approach to Evaluating Open Access Journals
【24h】

An Expanded Approach to Evaluating Open Access Journals

机译：评估开放存取期刊的扩展方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The advent of open access publishing necessitates evaluating the quality of a plethora of new journals. The problem of ensuring quality is inherent in the benefits and goals of open access publishing, which attempts to establish a system for reporting research findings that is inclusive and expeditious. However, inclusivity and speed may run counter to the goals of quality and reliability, and the pressure for researchers to publish creates incentives to participate in a fraudulent system. This paper presents an alternative approach to evaluating the legitimacy of open access publications. Those concerned about the quality of open access publishing have attempted to evaluate journals based on criteria that refer to externally available information. The approach used here provides additional, internal information about participation in journals' review processes. This additional information, namely, documentation of the process from submission through review to acceptance, is crucial for evaluating potentially fraudulent open access journals that might appear legitimate based on publicly available information.
机译：开放获取出版的出现需要评估大量新期刊的质量。确保质量的问题是开放获取发布的利益和目标所固有的，开放获取的目的是建立一个包容且迅速的报告研究结果的系统。但是，包容性和速度可能与质量和可靠性的目标背道而驰，研究人员发表论文的压力促使人们参与了欺诈性系统。本文提出了另一种方法来评估开放获取出版物的合法性。那些关注开放获取出版质量的人已经尝试根据引用外部可用信息的标准来评估期刊。此处使用的方法提供了有关参与期刊审阅过程的其他内部信息。这些附加信息，即从提交到审核到接受的过程文档，对于评估潜在的欺诈性开放获取期刊（基于公开可用信息可能看起来合法）至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号