...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sex Research >Sex on the Brain?: An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social Desirability
【24h】

Sex on the Brain?: An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social Desirability

机译：脑中的性行为？：根据性别，性爱癖和社会期望性的功能对性认知的频率进行检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is commonly believed that men think about sex much more often than do women, but the empirical evidence in this area is fairly weak. By means of a golf tally counter, 283 college students kept track of their thoughts pertaining to food, sleep, or sex for one week. Males reported significantly more need-based cognitions overall, but there was no significant interaction between sex of participant and type of cognition recorded. Therefore, although these young men did think more about sex than did young women, they also thought more about food and sleep. In contrast, a retrospective estimated frequency of need-based cognitions obtained at the start of the study revealed a sex difference in sexual cognitions, but not thoughts about eating or sleeping. Erotophilia and sexual desirability responding were significant predictors of frequency of sexual cognitions for women, but not for men. Overall, erotophilia was a better predictor of sexual cognition than was sex of participant. Taken as a whole, the results suggest that, although there may be a sex difference in sexual cognitions, it is smaller than is generally thought, and the reporting is likely influenced by sex role expectations.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.565429
机译：通常认为，男人比女人更多地考虑性，但是在这方面的经验证据还很薄弱。借助于高尔夫理货柜台，有283名大学生追踪了他们与饮食，睡眠或性有关的思想达一周。男性总体上报告了更多基于需求的认知，但参与者的性别与所记录的认知类型之间没有显着的相互作用。因此，尽管这些年轻男人比年轻女人对性的思考更多，但他们对食物和睡眠的思考也更多。相比之下，研究开始时对基于需求的认知的回顾性估计频率揭示了性认知中的性别差异，但没有关于进食或睡眠的想法。嗜好和性欲反应是女性而非男性的性认知频率的重要预测指标。总体而言，嗜酒癖比参与者的性别更好地预测了性认知。从总体上看，结果表明，尽管在性认知上可能存在性别差异，但该差异要比通常认为的要小，并且该报告很可能受到性别角色期望的影响。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand ：“ Taylor＆Francis Online”，services_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，more”，pubid：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.565429

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号