...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Slavic Military Studies >Sacrifice For Stalin: The Cost And Value Of The Arctic Convoys Reassessed, David Wragg. (south Yorkshire: Pen & Sword, 2005). Pp. Xv, 224, $39.99
【24h】

Sacrifice For Stalin: The Cost And Value Of The Arctic Convoys Reassessed, David Wragg. (south Yorkshire: Pen & Sword, 2005). Pp. Xv, 224, $39.99

机译:牺牲斯大林:重新评估北极车队的成本和价值,大卫·瓦格(David Wragg)。 (南约克郡:Pen&Sword,2005年)。 Pp。 Xv,224,39.99美元

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his introduction David Wragg promises that in his book "for the first time, the whole question of whether or not the sacrifice [of aid to Russia] was worthwhile is examined" (p. xiv). This is an important question, and answering it would mean utilizing the most recent historiography, scouring British and American archives, and analyzing economic, military, and strategic elements of decision making, and their results, to come up with a remotely convincing answer. Wragg does not even make the attempt. Instead the reader is treated to what feels like Cold-War deja vu. Wragg's central argument is an ahistorical one. He asserts that the Arctic convoys were a waste because they helped the Russians beat the Germans, and therefore contributed to a stronger Russia confronting the West in the Cold War. He thus takes for granted that the Allies were destined to win, and that the Russians were too, assumptions that only the most devout optimists could have held at the time.
机译:戴维·瓦格(David Wragg)在其引言中承诺,“他的书首次“探讨了(对俄罗斯的援助)牺牲是否值得的整个问题”(第xiv页)。这是一个重要的问题,要回答这个问题,就意味着要利用最新的史学,搜查英美档案馆,分析决策的经济,军事和战略要素及其结果,以得出令人信服的答案。 Wragg甚至没有尝试。取而代之的是,读者被视为冷战似曾相识。伍格的中心论点是历史性的。他断言,北极车队是浪费,因为它们帮助俄罗斯人击败了德国人,因此为冷战中强大的俄罗斯与西方对抗做出了贡献。因此,他认为盟军注定会获胜,而俄罗斯人也理所当然地认为,当时只有最虔诚的乐观主义者才能坚持。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号