...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law >Gate-keeper, supervisor or mentor? The role of professional bodies in the regulation and professional development of solicitors and family mediators undertaking divorce matters in England and Wales
【24h】

Gate-keeper, supervisor or mentor? The role of professional bodies in the regulation and professional development of solicitors and family mediators undertaking divorce matters in England and Wales

机译:看门人,主管或指导者?专业团体在英格兰和威尔士从事离婚事务的律师和家庭调解员的监管和专业发展中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article sets out findings from a grounded theory analysis of the professional training and accreditation requirements for solicitors, accredited specialist family law solicitors and family mediators in England and Wales as set by their professional bodies: the Law Society of England and Wales and the then UK College of Family Mediators. 1  1. The UK College of Family Mediators has since changed its name to the College of Mediators and has broadened its disciplinary base from family law to encompass community mediation and other branches of mediation practice too. I shall use the new title throughout the article, although the research was conducted prior to the name and focus change. In addition, the Family Mediation Council has been established to standardise training and professional standards for family mediators and between family mediation bodies (including the Law Society and the College of Mediators). However, this has not made a substantial impact on the training requirements or the apparent messages that the bodies send to their members. On this basis, alongside the constraints associated with an article of this length, the Council's role will not be discussed in detail. View all notes It examines the roles that the professional bodies ascribe to themselves with respect to their profession and their members, considering the extent to which professional regulation fulfils gate-keeping, supervisory or mentoring roles. In conclusion it suggests that in the light of the cues transmitted by the professional bodies in England and Wales in respect of divorce cases and clients, the very nature of professional practice as a family law solicitor and as a family mediator is being transformed into a form of hybrid practice that draws upon two radically different epistemological traditions, with important consequences for solicitors, family mediators and their clients.2  2. This is discussed in much more detail in Webley (2010 forthcoming) . View all notes Thus, it challenges the largely accepted dichotomy of adversarial divorce practice on the part of solicitors in opposition to the consensus-based approach practised by family mediators.View full textDownload full textKeywordssolicitors, family mediators, gate-keeping, supervision, mentoringRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506308
机译:本文根据对英国,威尔士律师协会,英格兰和威尔士法律协会以及当时的英国的律师,经认可的专业家庭法律师和家庭调解员的专业培训和资格认证要求进行的扎根理论分析,得出结论。家庭调解员学院。 1 – 1。此后,英国家庭调解员学院更名为调解员学院,并将其学科基础从家庭法扩大到社区调解和其他调解实践分支。尽管在名称和重点更改之前进行了研究,但我将在整篇文章中使用新标题。此外,还成立了家庭调解委员会,以规范家庭调解员之间以及家庭调解机构(包括律师协会和调解员学院)之间的培训和专业标准。但是,这并没有对培训要求或机构发送给其成员的明显信息产生重大影响。在此基础上,除了与该篇文章相关的限制外,将不详细讨论安理会的作用。查看所有注释它检查专业机构在其专业及其成员方面所赋予的角色,并考虑专业法规在多大程度上履行关守,监督或指导作用。总之,这表明,鉴于英格兰和威尔士的专业机构针对离婚案件和客户提出的暗示,作为家庭法律律师和家庭调解员的专业实践的本质正在转变为一种形式。借鉴了两种截然不同的认识论传统的混合实践,对律师,家庭调解员及其客户产生了重要影响。2– 2。 Webley(2010年即将出版)对此进行了更详细的讨论。因此,它挑战了律师对抗对抗性离婚做法的二分法,与家庭调解员基于共识的做法相反。查看全文下载全文关键字律师,家庭调解员,守门,监督,指导相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506308

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号