...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law >Civil mediation: a measured approach?
【24h】

Civil mediation: a measured approach?

机译：民事调解：一种审慎的方法？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The mediation movement in Britain over the last 15 years has been enormously successful in establishing a firm place in policy debates on the administration of civil and family justice. Arguably, it has taken the lead and framed the content of debate outside the criminal sphere. The mediation movement has challenged the purpose of the civil and family justice systems, the value of public courts, the relevance of judicial determination to modern disputes and the legal profession's commitment to representative advocacy. We have witnessed a revolution in dispute resolution discourse. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, political arguments, judicial speeches and policy pronouncements about how civil and family justice should be working now focus on how to encourage or force more people to mediate, on worrying about why more people aren't mediating, and on promoting the value of mediation to the justice system and society as a whole. 1  1. See comments by Lord Bach, 9 February 2009; Lord Philips of Worth Matravers, Alternative dispute resolution: an English viewpoint, Speech, India, 29 March 2008 [online]. Available from: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/; Lord Justice Clarke, MR, Speech to annual mediation council conference, Birmingham, May 2008 [online]. Available from: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk. See also the Legal Services consultation document, A new focus for civil legal aid: encouraging early resolution; discouraging unnecessary litigation (DCA 2004) and the Government Response at http://www.dca.gov.uk/response-litigation.pdf, which focused on family cases and ‘discouraging unnecessary publicly-funded litigation’. See also on judicial review, Bondy et al. (2005). View all notes View full textDownload full textKeywordsmediation, dispute resolution, criminal justice costsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506314
机译：在过去的15年中，英国的调解运动取得了巨大的成功，在有关民事和家庭司法的政策辩论中确立了稳固的地位。可以说，它已率先在犯罪领域之外确立了辩论的内容。调解运动对民事和家庭司法制度的目的，公共法院的价值，司法裁定与现代争端的相关性以及法律界对代言人的承诺提出了挑战。我们目睹了争端解决话语的革命。在二十一世纪初，关于民事和家庭司法应如何运作的政治论点，司法演讲和政策声明现在集中在如何鼓励或强迫更多人进行调解上，担心为什么更多人不进行调解，以及提高调解对司法系统和整个社会的价值。 1 – 1。见巴赫勋爵的评论，2009年2月9日； Worth Matravers的Philips勋爵，《替代性争议解决：英语观点》，印度演讲，2008年3月29日[在线]。可从以下网站获得：http：//www.judiciary.gov.uk/；克拉克勋爵大法官（MR）在年度调解委员会年会上的讲话，伯明翰，2008年5月[在线]。可从以下网站获得：http：//www.judiciary.gov.uk。另见法律服务咨询文件，民事法律援助的新焦点：鼓励及早解决；不鼓励不必要的诉讼（DCA 2004）和http://www.dca.gov.uk/response-litigation.pdf上的政府回应，其中着重于家庭案件并“杜绝不必要的公共资助诉讼”。另见司法审查，邦迪等人。 （2005）。查看所有注释查看全文下载全文关键字调解，争端解决，刑事司法费用相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google ，more“，pubid：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506314

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号