...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law >Mandatory mediation of family disputes: reflections from Australia
【24h】

Mandatory mediation of family disputes: reflections from Australia

机译：强制性调解家庭纠纷：澳大利亚的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years the UK government has increasingly promoted the use of mediation in family law matters, particularly in cases involving children, and there has been continuing debate about whether such processes should be mandatory. Australian policy-makers took this step in 2006, enacting reforms which require parents in conflict to make a ‘genuine effort’ to resolve their dispute through a ‘family dispute resolution’ process before being eligible to apply for court orders. As a consequence of this policy shift, there has been a growing interface between legal practitioners and mediation professionals in Australia. This article draws on an empirical investigation of collaboration between these two groups to reflect on the implications of compulsory mediation for client services and inter-professional practices. Its analysis suggests that there are benefits to be had from an increased use of alternative dispute resolution programmes, both for families and the legal system, but that much will depend on the culture of collaboration and the training of practitioners.View full textDownload full textKeywordsmediation, parenting disputes, inter-professional relationships, collaborative practicesRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506313
机译：近年来，英国政府在家庭法事务中，尤其是在涉及儿童的案件中，越来越多地促进使用调解，并且关于这种程序是否应强制执行的争论一直在持续。澳大利亚政策制定者在2006年采取了这一步骤，进行了改革，要求冲突中的父母必须通过“家庭纠纷解决”程序做出“真正的努力”来解决其纠纷，然后才有资格申请法院命令。 。由于这一政策转变，澳大利亚的法律从业者与调解专业人员之间的联系日益紧密。本文基于对这两个小组之间合作的实证研究，以反映强制性调解对客户服务和专业间实践的影响。它的分析表明，为家庭和法律体系增加使用替代性争端解决方案会带来好处，但是这在很大程度上取决于合作文化和从业人员的培训。查看全文下载全文关键字中介，育儿纠纷，专业之间的关系，协作做法相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，service_compact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，pubid ：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506313

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号