...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the society of archivists >Archiving federally, writing regionally: archival practices and princely state histories in postcolonial India
【24h】

Archiving federally, writing regionally: archival practices and princely state histories in postcolonial India

机译：归档归档，写出地区：档案实践和后殖民地印度的状态历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines the paucity of pre-1947 Indian princely state records, especially those regarding their federalist advocacies from the 1920s through 1940s, in the various provincial archives in postcolonial India. Why is it that archives in Delhi and London have the majority of records pertaining to the federalist advocacies of the princely states, rather than the archives in provincial states that were constituted by the merger of princely states themselves? The absence of princely state federalist records reveals a surprising indifference to the preservation of historical records in various state archives. Indian archival laws pertain to public records alone, leaving out responsibility for the acquisition and preservation of historical records. Consequently, in India, the phrase "archival records" has come to mean public records more than 30 years old; there is no clarity as to what "historical records" are, nor guidance on how they should be preserved. Indian archival laws maintain a colonial understanding of the archive, wherein the function of the archive is to tame history in service of the state rather than preserve history outright. Taming the nation's history in state archives silences the multiplicity of voices about Indian federation and presents particular difficulties when writing regional histories.
机译：本文介绍了1947年前印度普通国家记录的缺乏，特别是20世纪20年代到20世纪40年代的联邦党倡导者的缺乏症，在后殖民印度的各个省级档案中。为什么德里和伦敦的档案馆有大多数记录依靠王国的联邦主义倡导者，而不是省国的档案，这些国家是由王国本身的合并所构成的？缺席王国联邦主义记录令人惊讶的漠不关心，对各国档案中的历史记录保存。印度档案法律涉及独自的公共纪录，为收购和保护历史记录造成了责任。因此，在印度，“档案记录”这一短语已达到30岁以上的公共纪录;关于“历史记录”是什么，也没有关于如何保留的指导。印度档案法维持对档案的殖民地理解，其中档案的功能是驯服状态的历史，而不是完全保护历史。驯服国家档案中的历史沉默着关于印度联邦的多种声音，在写区域历史时呈现特殊的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号