...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Southern African Studies >Madness, Corruption and Exile: On Zimbabwe's Remaining White Commercial Farmers
【24h】

Madness, Corruption and Exile: On Zimbabwe's Remaining White Commercial Farmers

机译：疯狂，腐败和流放：关于津巴布韦剩下的白人商业农民

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since the launch by the Zimbabwean government in 2000 of its ‘fast-track land reform programme’, many white farmers have been expelled from their farms. This article focuses not on the evictions themselves, but rather on what their effects reveal about the social order of the white farming community, its values and changing ideas about otherness and belonging. The effects of displacement are analysed indirectly through an examination of those farmers who have managed to remain on their land. In particular, this article considers the social meaning of the opprobrium faced by some of those who are still on their farms. In the cases considered here, this opprobrium takes two forms: accusations of corruption and labelling of people as ‘crazy’ or ‘mad’. Those who manage to remain on their farms are seen as a threat to a social order that is based on separation between white farmers and black Africans. The racial cohabitation that currently takes place on some farms is experienced by the rest of the white farming community as a form of symbolic, social and mental disorder, a betrayal of the values and ‘habitus’ (to borrow from Bourdieu) of their community. Opprobrium can then be understood as a final attempt by some members of the white community to contain this disorder. Indeed, many of those who have left their farms but stayed on in Zimbabwe have tried to keep the values of the white community intact. They are maintaining these values in the face of the community's disintegration as a result of farm occupations, which have put them in a position akin to internal exile.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.609341
机译：自2000年津巴布韦政府启动“快速土地改革计划”以来，许多白人农民被逐出农场。本文的重点不在于搬迁本身，而在于搬迁对白人农业社区的社会秩序，其价值以及关于异性和归属的观念转变的影响。通过检查那些设法留在土地上的农民，间接分析了流离失所的影响。特别是，本文考虑了仍在农场中的某些人所面临的op亵行为的社会意义。在这里考虑的情况下，这种op亵行为有两种形式：对腐败的指控和将人们贴上“疯狂”或“疯狂”的标签。那些设法留在自己农场上的人被视为对基于白人农民与黑人非洲人分离的社会秩序的威胁。白色农场社区的其他成员经历了当前在某些农场上发生的种族同居生活，这是象征性，社会和精神错乱的一种形式，是对价值观念和“ habitus”（向布迪厄借用）的背叛。他们的社区。然后，pro病可以被理解为是白人社区中某些成员遏制这种疾病的最终尝试。确实，许多人离开了农场但仍留在津巴布韦，他们试图保持白人社区的价值不变。面对由于农场占领而导致的社区解体，他们维持着这些价值观，这使他们处于内部流亡的境地。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，services_compact ：：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，美味，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，pubid：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057070.2011.609341

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号