• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of technology transfer >What are the trade-offs of academic entrepreneurship? An investigation on the Italian case
【24h】

What are the trade-offs of academic entrepreneurship? An investigation on the Italian case

机译：学术创业的权衡是什么？对意大利案件的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study addresses the following research questions: what happens to the propensity to collaborate with other firms, once the researcher creates her own venture? Do her collaborations decrease or do they grow? These questions have been overlooked by the current literature, even though they carry important policy implications. Our key suggestion is that the effectiveness of a technology transfer tool can be better assessed by taking into account the possible crowding-out effects with other channels of knowledge transfer. We do so for Italy, by comparing the behavior of single researchers, before and after the establishment of their own firm, with the behavior of a control group. We assess whether those academics that founded their own firm significantly change their attitude to perform research collaborations with other firms by means of co-publication and co-patenting. We also verify whether creating a firm has an impact on the overall patenting and publication performance. Our results suggest that there is a negative effect on the overall publishing performance, while the patenting activity does not change significantly. Regarding co-publications, our results confirm the existence of a substitution effect between spin-offs and co-publication with firms, while we observe an increase in the case of co-patenting. A closer look at the data, however, suggests that the latter is mainly triggered by the patenting activity that the researcher performs with his or her own company.
机译：这项研究解决了以下研究问题：一旦研究人员创建了自己的企业，与其他公司合作的倾向会如何？她的合作减少还是增加？这些问题尽管具有重要的政策含义，但被当前文献所忽略。我们的主要建议是，通过考虑其他知识转移渠道可能产生的挤出效应，可以更好地评估技术转移工具的有效性。在意大利，我们通过将单个研究人员在自己公司成立之前和之后的行为与对照组的行为进行比较，来进行研究。我们评估了那些创办自己公司的学者是否通过联合出版和专利申请大大改变了与其他公司进行研究合作的态度。我们还将验证创建公司是否对整体专利和出版业绩有影响。我们的结果表明，对总体发布绩效有负面影响，而专利活动没有明显变化。关于共同公开，我们的结果证实了分拆和与公司共同公开之间存在替代效应，而我们发现共同专利的情况有所增加。然而，仔细研究数据表明，后者主要是由研究人员与自己公司进行的专利活动触发的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号